华人澳洲中文论坛

热图推荐

    Strongly disagree on the new property tax in NSW

    [复制链接]

    2021-5-15 21:23:17 206 16

    1. The new homes developed by developers will have no choice but property tax as the developers will only choose property tax as they want to minimize short term costs.

    2. One way valve for not able to change back from property tax to stamp duty will separate the society further. The mid-class families working hard and wanting to upgrade to bigger homes will be harder to reach as there will be fewer stamp duty properties and they will be more expensive due to the demand and supply.

    3. The new scheme will not help the first home buyers as their main hurdle is the deposit saving but to burden them further due to the life-time property tax liability.

    4. People will be forced out of their homes when their property tax increases due to the increase of land value. They are forced to move to worse areas. The hardship scheme will not help everyone who wants to keep his/her home.

    5. No other states are having a similar scheme, NSW will lose the attractions of investing and living in the housing market. The state revenue will fall due to the decrease in the number of housing transactions and place further burden on the owners who choose the property tax.

    6. People will choose to invest and contribute to other states instead of NSW like us.

    全部回复16

    wanghuijune 发表于 2021-5-15 20:46:18

    wanghuijune 沙发

    2021-5-15 20:46:18

    看看能不克不及中用吧。 政府打定主张了, 要不论经济好坏, 每一年都从房产上拿到算的出来的税。 但愿支持能有用。
    cshark 发表于 2021-5-15 20:48:10

    cshark 板凳

    2021-5-15 20:48:10

    5. No other states are having a similar scheme, NSW will lose the attractions of investing and living in the housing market. The state revenue will fall due to the decrease in the number of housing transactions and place further burden on the owners who choose the property tax.

    ACT?
    xiuxiandao 发表于 2021-5-15 20:51:18

    xiuxiandao 地板

    2021-5-15 20:51:18

    楼主应该去投票
    http://www..com.au/bbs/f ... ead&tid=1639174
    过路人 发表于 2021-5-15 20:53:26

    过路人 5#

    2021-5-15 20:53:26


    就是刚刚投了才来的
    woovi 发表于 2021-5-15 20:58:03

    woovi 6#

    2021-5-15 20:58:03

    我不赞成的是上任房东选了分期,下任也不能不选分期的这个限度。
    seele 发表于 2021-5-15 20:59:22

    seele 7#

    2021-5-15 20:59:22


    这不就是the whole point the gov wants to move to property tax好收钱吗
    moonlight 发表于 2021-5-15 21:00:30

    moonlight 8#

    2021-5-15 21:00:30

    这个房产税要是开征。子孙昆裔自住房年年交税,糊口本钱大大减少。哎
    holyfeld 发表于 2021-5-15 21:03:20

    holyfeld 9#

    2021-5-15 21:03:20

    这个政策最大问题是假如退休后没有了支出政府是不是持续收自住房property tax,假如是那些老外怎么办,中国人多半有积蓄撑持。
    萧云飞 发表于 2021-5-15 21:06:56

    萧云飞 10#

    2021-5-15 21:06:56

    政府确定会想方设法补上财政赤字
    siluoer 发表于 2021-5-15 21:08:46

    siluoer 11#

    2021-5-15 21:08:46


    老外退休只能卖房,downsize 去公寓
    vbcoco 发表于 2021-5-15 21:09:46

    vbcoco 12#

    2021-5-15 21:09:46

    支持了,而后呢?
    政府缺钱,而后支持一下政府就不缺钱了,就啥也不干了?
    所有才刚开始。当前还会有税,好比承继税。静待佳音。
    我等工具人就无需操心了。
    SJBCCCD 发表于 2021-5-15 21:10:54

    SJBCCCD 13#

    2021-5-15 21:10:54


    这么颓丧吗。
    好歹也要对抗一下呀
    拉链 发表于 2021-5-15 21:15:02

    拉链 14#

    2021-5-15 21:15:02


    华人群体才占多少比例,就算都投了no又如何。况且有人还投yes。
    至于非华人,没房没产为什么要投no,让有房有产的苦楚一下岂不很好。至于权贵阶层早有化解之法,天然yes,他们也是规定的制订者,隐士有妙计。
    这类情景下,对抗的逻辑在哪里。
    just1 发表于 2021-5-15 21:17:18

    just1 15#

    2021-5-15 21:17:18

    工党上就推延几年
    ssz 发表于 2021-5-15 21:22:10

    ssz 16#

    2021-5-15 21:22:10


    为何别的州都不搞这个货色
    Sqqdjatapq 发表于 2021-5-15 21:23:17

    Sqqdjatapq 17#

    2021-5-15 21:23:17


    所以别的州没有轻轨这么初级的货色

    发表回复

    您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

    返回列表 本版积分规则

    :
    论坛元老
    :
    论坛短信
    :
    未填写
    :
    未填写
    :
    未填写

    主题465

    帖子7202

    积分16123

    图文推荐